Explaining how ecologically similar predators coexist remains a central challenge in community ecology, especially in tropical ecosystems with seasonal fluctuations. I developed a size-structured predator–prey model to examine how prey body-size distributions, predator resource-use strategies, and seasonal variation in prey availability influence predator abundance balance and persistence. The model incorporates continuous prey-size structure, predator-specific exploitation kernels, seasonal changes in resource productivity, and density-dependent population dynamics. Simulation experiments showed that predator trait differentiation, particularly divergence in preferred prey size and dietary breadth, substantially increased abundance balance and reduced competitive asymmetry. Combined differentiation in prey-size preference and dietary breadth produced the strongest coexistence outcomes and increased minimum predator abundance from 12.5 ± 4.0 to 29.7 ± 2.5 individuals, indicating that trait differentiation enhanced both relative abundance balance and abundance of the less abundant predator. Sensitivity analyses identified prey-size divergence as the strongest determinant of predator abundance balance, followed by dietary breadth differentiation and prey productivity, whereas demographic parameters had weaker effects. Environmental variability modified these outcomes, with prey productivity exerting a stronger influence on predator balance than seasonal forcing alone. Although motivated by sympatric African snakes, the framework generates theoretical predictions rather than demonstrating that prey-size partitioning necessarily maintains coexistence. Overall, the model provides a testable framework for understanding predator coexistence in seasonally variable ecosystems and shows that apparent dietary overlap does not necessarily imply ecological equivalence because size-mediated resource partitioning can reduce competitive asymmetry and promote predator persistence.