To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
Gabriel Kessler, Universidad Nacional de San Martin-Escuela Interdisciplinaria de Estudios Sociales (EIDAES), Argentina,Maria Victoria Murillo, Columbia University, New York
This chapter examines the disconnect between political elites, business elites, and the general public’s policy priorities across Latin America from the 2000s to 2010s. Using surveys of legislators (PELA) and public opinion data (LAPOP), we find general correspondence on major problems but significant gaps in issue salience. Both groups shifted from economic concerns in the 2000s to public safety and corruption in the 2010s. However, political elites consistently underestimated public concern for crime, with gaps reaching 29 points in Mexico. Elite-public alignment on poverty/inequality was better, improving over time. Business and political elites showed substantial disagreement on democracy satisfaction (11-28 point gaps) but closer views on economic liberalization. Countries experiencing vertical discontent (Chile, Colombia, Guatemala, and Peru) correspond with those where corruption became salient and elites remained disconnected from public safety concerns. This elite disconnect contributed to mass protests in 2019–20, highlighting representation deficits that fuel political discontent across the region.
An account of the drafting of the US Constitution focusing on its basic structure, the rejection of monarchy, the place of the presidency and executive power in the constitutional framework, and the debates over whether a pardon power should be confided in the president and, if so, the extent of the pardon power and whether it should be shared with or limited by Congress or the judiciary. The chapter also addresses constitutional constraints on presidential power including impeachment and criminal prosecution.
Recounts the pardon practice of the presidents from Woodrow Wilson to Lyndon Johnson. Notes the continuing expansion of federal criminal justice establishment, the effect of Prohibition, the expansion of the federal criminal code, and anti-narcotics campaigns on the federal prison population, and the continued low rate of clemency grants through this period. Focuses especially on clemency sought and granted for crimes of desertion or political protest during the two world wars and the Korean Conflict. Notes in particular questionable uses of the pardon power by President Harry Truman to grant relief to political allies.
Recounts the events of Donald Trump’s first term, including the Mueller investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and Trump’s two impeachments. The focus is on Trump’s use of the pardon power as a tool in obstructing investigation into his own wrongdoing as well as a means of protecting the corrupt politicians and white-collar criminals who supported him. Attention is also given to Trump’s transformation of the pardon application process from a formal standardized procedure into a game of connections and private access.
This article examines how the EU conceptualises the relationship between anti-corruption and lobbying regulation (be it lobbying regulation that applies to the EU institutions or lobbying regulation adopted in the EU Member States). Since 2020, the EU’s annual Rule of Law Reports have mentioned lobbying regulation in the context of anti-corruption measures, but this framing pertains to lobbying regulation in the Member States and not at the level of the EU. Yet, especially after the 2022 Qatargate lobbying and corruption scandal, the EU has been under pressure to reform itself and to protect its institutions from foreign influence and corruption. The article discusses recent developments in this area and examines their relationship to the EU’s broader anti-corruption and lobbying framework. It builds on relevant literature on political corruption in constitutional law and political theory. It compares the EU’s approach to foreign vs “standard” (domestic), private vs public, and supranational vs national lobbying and corruption.
This article considers the interpretation of the provisions of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention that regulate investigation and prosecution of foreign bribery. The central claim is that the function of these ‘enforcement obligations’ is to prevent under-enforcement, discriminatory enforcement or concealed enforcement. Interpretation should involve close attention to the specificities of their text as well as the contexts in which the obligations operate, and, when those methods fail, their functions. These claims are illustrated through a study of the application of the provisions to Canada’s handling of the SNC-Lavalin case.
Why do individuals embedded in organizations act corruptly? Functionalist and economic approaches to corruption have had limited success in explaining why individuals choose corruption where there are strong institutional constraints, including monitoring systems, high costs, and strong punishments. The persistence of corruption despite such constraints has prompted researchers to consider more seriously the individual psychological drivers of corruption. This chapter reviews evidence on the psychology of corruption, finding that power, ethical leadership, personal gain and self-control, loss aversion and risk acceptance, rationalization, moral ambiguity and disengagement, learning, and emotion all influence an individual’s propensity to act corruptly within an organization. Anti-corruption measures that constrain these drivers include transparency, participation, and accountability measures that reduce incentives and opportunities for corruption. Organizations can also implement ethical measures like codes of conduct, anti-corruption training, attend to cultural dynamics, and use nudging interventions to incentivize clean behavior.
This comment assesses the evidence from four papers on the development process for four breakthrough drugs or treatments. The comment notes that the papers show all the key breakthroughs in the development process were financed either through the National Institutes of Health or various foundations or charities, not drug companies looking to be compensated through patent monopolies. It argues that this evidence suggests patent monopolies are an unnecessary distortion that results in high drug prices and creates perverse incentives. Expanded public funding could replace patent monopolies, allowing new drugs to be sold at free market prices, ending the problem of high drug prices blocking access.
Why do leaders intensify identity entrepreneurship? Existing scholarship treats it as a structural constant, available where cleavages are salient, rather than a behavior whose intensity varies with political conditions. Working within the instrumentalist tradition of social identities, this article theorizes anti-corruption pressure as a cause of that variation. Such pressure varies in biographical content (whether media revelations, congressional proceedings, and prosecutorial acts name the leader and the family), and this content makes legal exposure translatable into a persecution frame. When credible, the translation activates a solidarity mechanism with two outputs emerging at different rates: a loyal base among identity-linked publics whose disapproval attenuates independently of programmatic performance, and endorsement from identity-led social organizations that raises the political costs of accountability. Credibility requires a pre-political biographical anchor; prior polarization and macroeconomic deterioration relax the strategy’s costs. Process tracing of peripheral identity entrepreneurship (PIE) during Pedro Castillo’s presidency in Peru (2021–22) illustrates the argument.
We evaluated an edutainment intervention to encourage electoral corruption reporting in northern Nigeria via a live broadcast of a popular Hausa-language TV show, which aired October–December 2022, shortly before the February 2023 presidential elections. We incorporated behaviorally informed anticorruption messages into the scripts of the TV drama to encourage its tens of millions of viewers to report instances of electoral corruption. We used a randomized encouragement trial design, sampling over 6,000 participants across northern Nigeria through pre-recorded phone surveys. Watching the show caused a statistically significant increase in the perceived helpfulness and frequency of reporting, but we could not detect changes in knowledge of how to report or reporting behaviors.
The EU chose “anti-corruption” to target a particular mode of citizenship acquisition: citizenship by investment. The fact that no other mode of acquiring citizenship has been actively stigmatised through “corruption” rhetoric, including discretionary naturalisations based on economic contributions, suggests that corruption was by no means the European Commission’s main concern. The high importance of citizenship could indeed carry corruption risks associated with it. This, however, cannot be the sole ground for closing particular avenues for naturalisation. Improving the enforcement of the rule of law and the effective implementation of anti-corruption mechanisms are more suitable approaches. Fighting “corruption” served as a rhetorical device deployed by the Commission to stop the supposedly corrupting effects of investment naturalisations on the ethno-nationalist Eurowhiteness model, which this institution, together with the Court of Justice, has chosen for Europeans in direct departure from the law in force. “Anti-corruption,” thus, helped achieve institutional ends unrelated to either fighting corruption or reinforcing the rule of law and other values in the EU.
This paper argues that the pervasive political and economic power of the Thai military is fundamentally rooted in a neo-feudal logic, echoing the Thai sakdina culture. While modern in appearance, the armed forces operate a patrimonial system where high-ranking officers behave like feudal lords, managing fragmented and autonomous fiefdoms of wealth across decentralized branches. This research identifies two structural pillars of the system: the autonomous fiefdoms and the near-total absence of external oversight. These two pillars facilitate systematic extraction and distribution of commercial revenues hidden from the public gaze. The military’s dominant political position allows it to reclassify private interests as matters of national security, effectively bypassing the rule of law and shielding its economic fiefdoms from civilian scrutiny. Ultimately, this paper underscores that the military’s business operations represent an institutionalized neo-feudal construct, a primary obstacle to professional military reform.
By the early seventeenth century, England’s prisons were reaching breaking point. Prison unrest and rioting became increasingly common as prisoners agitated against reportedly parlous conditions, extortionate fees and abusive treatment. In the process, they formulated more general critiques of the prison system. Chapter 5 explores in detail an interrelated set of disturbances within London’s Fleet and King’s Bench prisons between 1618 and 1621. This period of collective violence and the petitioning that followed precipitated political and rhetorical shifts in prisoners’ arguments, from opposing corruption within prisons (based on local custom) to new calls for the abolition of imprisonment for debt (based on the ancient constitution). By this means, prisoners developed a diagnosis of their condition alongside a set of remedies that challenged prevailing carceral ideologies rather than reinforcing them. Thus, this chapter suggests that while political languages based on the past could help negotiate the terms of subordination, they could also directly challenge assumptions about social order.
By 1647, the abolition of imprisonment for debt had become a staple of radical demands. Yet like so many radical projects, it ultimately suffered defeat and moderation. Chapter 8 traces the rise and fall of the abolitionist campaign, and the legacy of prison reform in the later seventeenth century. First, it follows arguments for abolition and the activists who made them into the new political and intellectual context of the English republic, revealing the significance of prison activism and arguments for abolition in debates over the future of the English polity. Yet these activists struggled to secure the change they envisioned. Worse still, their ideas dwindled in significance after the restoration of Charles II, giving way to prison campaigning that prioritised moderate calls for episodic relief and the reform of conditions. Yet, this also involved ambitious nationwide campaigning, connecting central prisons with county gaols for the first time. This led to increased concern with local inspection, due process and penal proportionality that anticipated the eighteenth-century prison reform movement. By the end of the seventeenth century, many aspects of imprisonment for debt and prison campaigning settled into patterns that would define the institution for another two centuries.
Prisons were emblematic of early modern state formation, expanding in tandem with the growing impingement of state officers and the legal system on everyday life. Chapter 1 focuses on the institutional development of prisons, the officers who ran them and their place within the officeholding state. It surveys the variety of prisons in England, the product of gradual and uneven development that gave rise to institutions that operated within a series of overlapping jurisdictions and that struggled with a rapidly expanding carceral population. This decentralised carceral infrastructure – so typical of the early modern state – also posed challenges for prison governance and regulation, opening the system to claims of corruption and profiteering. Thus, this chapter explores the place of the gaoler within the wider dynamics of early modern officeholding authority and the disciplinary maintenance of economic and social stability. It argues that as unpopular state agents, gaolers posed challenges to political legitimacy, in extreme cases generating hostility towards state and legal authority.
At Tabula Cebetis 19.2, the medieval Greek manuscripts transmit a sentence with one word in it that makes no sense in this context. Though editors print this text, they do not explain this word satisfactorily. Normally this is the sort of textual problem that scholars would attempt to resolve by emending the word in question; but there is no satisfactory conjectural emendation available. Comparing the Arabic translation of this text, however, suggests that the problem lies deeper and involves not just this one word but instead a missing conditional clause.
While existing literature has studied the political consequences of corruption, surprisingly little is known about how corruption is associated with voters’ preferences for particular leader characteristics. Using both micro- and macro-level cross-national data, this study analyses whether prevalent corruption is associated with a greater likelihood that young leaders attain executive office. We argue that, in democracies, a higher level of corruption makes younger leaders more electorally attractive because they can be perceived as less embedded in entrenched political networks and more likely to pursue anti-corruption reforms. By analysing data on various political leaders’ backgrounds from 110 democracies between 2001 and 2020, we find that a higher level of corruption is associated with younger elected leaders in democracies. Using the Afrobarometer survey data from 15 African democracies between 2019 and 2020, we find additional evidence that a negative perception of corruption increases citizens’ support for introducing a maximum age limit for presidential candidates. Our study contributes to the literature on leadership selection by highlighting the role of corruption in shaping voter preferences for young leaders.
If a mobilized constituency for programmatism is one way out of a weak-state trap, then the state or external actors pushing for increased state capacity is another. I argue that intermediaries who informally link the state to citizens comprise a constituency against such a change, and may block this pathway out. The empirics in this chapter travel outside Senegal because observing resistance from intermediaries requires a real or perceived shock to state capacity. A within-country analysis in Mali first explores the types of local actors who would be willing to participate in a forthcoming local governance initiative to limit corruption and discretionary spending: performance-based financing of municipalities. The most embedded local leaders (who have operated longest and have the most social ties in the community) benefit more from clientelistic transfers from the mayor and are least willing to agree to monitor mayoral performance under the new initiative. Then, leveraging a recent coordinated set of field experiments evaluating formalization interventions, I tell the stories of backlash in three of the six country cases by intermediaries who benefit from the status quo.
Land sales have been a significant source of revenue for Chinese local governments since the early 2000s. Contrary to popular belief, local governments did not turn to land finance to make up for lost tax revenues after the 1994 tax sharing reform. Rather, both before and after 1994, corrupt land sales were widespread, as officials sold land far below market prices in return for bribes. Even as the fiscal incentives for local governments to adopt land finance increased in the 1990s, state agents continued acting on their own personal interests rather than the institutional interests of local governments. Local governments only began to sell land at higher, market prices when an anti-corruption campaign launched by the central government made doing so a political imperative in the early 2000s. Local governments were much more responsive to political imperatives than to fiscal incentives.