Agroforestry can improve ecological resilience, broaden farm income streams, and support multifunctional land use, but production-oriented temperate systems remain unevenly adopted across the U.S. This study evaluates the factors influencing adoption of silvopasture, forest farming, and multistrata polycultures in New England, where small and mid-sized farms, extensive forest cover, and emerging practitioner networks create both opportunities and constraints. We conducted interviews with 27 agroforestry practitioners across all six New England states and administered a follow-up pairwise-comparison survey, yielding 23 valid responses. A Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats Analytic Network Process (SWOT-ANP) framework was used to rank adoption drivers and barriers while accounting for interdependencies among them. Establishment-stage threats received the highest category weight, with ecosystem disservices and resource limitations emerging as the top two priorities overall. The leading positive factor was the potential for additional revenue, underscoring the importance of early diversification pathways. Among weaknesses, limited expertise and time or management demands outweighed financial concerns, indicating that know-how, labor availability, coordination, and implementation capacity may be more restrictive than direct costs alone. By showing that practitioners prioritize early implementation risks over delayed benefits, this study reframes agroforestry adoption in New England as a question of establishment capacity, not simply producer interest.