To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Concerns have been raised regarding the UK psychiatry curriculum (2022) relating to variability in workplace-based assessment (WBPA) and to the assessment of the autonomy, formulation skills and non-clinical competencies of resident doctors in training. The Royal College of Psychiatrists established a Formative Assessment Working Group with four Task and Finish Groups comprising resident doctors in training, trainers, educational leaders, patients and carers. Stakeholder consultation, educational literature, psychometric evidence, cross-specialty benchmarking and iterative consensus-building informed the resulting recommendations.
Results
A five-point entrustability scale was introduced in end-of-placement reports to support judgements of the autonomy of resident doctors in training. A simplified WBPA rubric replaced the previous Likert scale. Formulation was embedded explicitly within case presentations, and structured patient and carer feedback was incorporated into portfolios. Direct observation of non-clinical skills was expanded to assess leadership, public mental health and system-level competencies aligned with curriculum’s High Level Outcomes.
Clinical implications
The reforms enhance consistency of supervision, strengthen clinical reasoning and reflective practice, and improve alignment between assessment, curriculum outcomes and consultant-level responsibilities without increasing overall assessment load.
To characterise recent trends in retractions of publications in the psychiatric literature. We examined the Retraction Watch Database for publications with the subject term ‘psychiatry’ between 2003 and 2023. We then characterised publication type, subject, country of origin, reason for retraction and time between publication and retraction.
Results
A total of 315 psychiatry publications were retracted; the annual number and rate (relative to publications) rose steadily across the study period. The median number of days from publication to retraction was 643 (interquartile range 223.0–2966.0). Reasons for retraction were unclear in 20 (6.3%) cases only; most commonly they were attributed to data error (42.5%) or problems relating to peer review (11.4%) – the period between publication and retraction was particularly long for the latter studies (median 3082 days, interquartile range 575–3364). A total of 4.4% were retracted because of falsification, and 6.32% because of plagiarism. Retracted items frequently focused on mood disorders (24.4%), psychosis (14.9%) and neurodevelopmental disorders (13.7%).
Clinical implications
Clinicians and policy makers rely on academic literature, but should be aware of the ethical, legal, business and professional dilemmas often encountered, yet not reported, in the process of considering retractions of unreliable data. Contested and unreliable findings may persist in the scientific record, with potential negative consequences for evidence based-care and policy, including the erosion of public trust.
Recent changes to formative assessment in UK psychiatry training aim to strengthen clinical reasoning, autonomy and alignment with consultant practice. Presenting these reforms to trainers and resident doctors revealed a gap between policy intention and front-line experience. The article reflects on this, exploring what implementation of assessment reform reveals about learning, trust and professional identity, highlighting how successful change depends not only on assessment design but also on engagement with those expected to use it.
This paper explores the direct and indirect effects of climate change on mental health. It then goes on to describe recent judgements in human rights courts globally on climate change and its mental health implications, holding national governments to account for the mental health implications of climate change. It then explores ways in which psychiatrists can start to influence this nexus of mental health, sustainability and human rights in their clinical practice, in research and education as well as in policy making. This influence can be at the level of the individual patient and at the local and national level. It argues that the lens of human rights is a useful way for psychiatrists to be more directly involved in matters concerning sustainability and climate change.
Autistic people are at high risk of mental health problems, yet psychiatrists report limited training and confidence with respect to autism. The National Autism Training Programme for Psychiatrists aimed to improve recognition and earlier diagnosis of autism and to promote reasonable adjustments and autism-informed practice. Over 1500 psychiatrists completed the foundation course, and over 250 undertook the enhanced course. Substantial improvements were observed in ten core autism-related competencies, alongside widespread reports of changes to individual clinical practice. The programme is among the largest autism training initiatives ever delivered to psychiatrists and provides important lessons for future programmes.
Psychiatry is a rewarding career, but many medical students have limited exposure to the specialty. Extracurricular enrichment programmes aim to provide early exposure to psychiatry, promote positive attitudes and encourage early career interest.
Aims
To systematically review literature on extracurricular psychiatry enrichment programmes for undergraduate medical students.
Method
The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251025990) and followed PRISMA guidelines. Four databases were searched using pre-determined search strings. Records were screened and data extracted independently by two authors. Quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis summarised and consolidated findings.
Results
Of 731 articles screened, 65 full reports were assessed for eligibility and 27 were included. These studies were conducted across 10 countries, most commonly the USA and UK. Programme duration and format varied from single-day events (n = 2) to longitudinal mentoring schemes spanning medical school (n = 5). Summer schools were most common (n = 10). Other schemes included mentoring, elective courses, special study modules, student-led clinics and film/media-based activities. Student feedback was positive, particularly for mentoring and film/media initiatives. Most studies reported improved attitudes towards psychiatry and mental illness, with several reporting statistically significant improvements using validated tools. Of 18 studies assessing career intentions, 16 reported increased interest in a career in psychiatry, and six studies reported higher subsequent match rates into psychiatry specialty training.
Conclusions
The available literature on voluntary extracurricular enrichment programmes suggests that they may provide positive student experiences and are associated with improved attitudes and early interest in psychiatry through meaningful learning opportunities. However, the evidence base is limited as most studies were small, self-selected samples with short-term follow-up and predominantly self-reported outcomes.
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated with high risks of adverse academic outcomes. A major motivation for initiating pharmacological treatment of ADHD is to mitigate these risks; however, the evidence regarding its long-term effects is inconclusive.
Aims
Our objective was to investigate the long-term causal effects of pharmacological treatment of ADHD on school grades in Norwegian children and adolescents.
Method
We analysed individual-level registry data of all Norwegians aged 5–15 years in 2009–2011 who were diagnosed with ADHD during this period (n = 6255). Treatment was measured as cumulative ADHD medication prescriptions from time of diagnosis to graduation from mandatory schooling (tenth grade). Outcomes included final grades in nine main school subjects, grade point average and non-assessment (exemption, no basis for assessment). We estimated ordinary least squares (OLS) and instrumental variable models. By exploiting naturally occurring variation in treatment practices, instrumental variable analysis can address residual confounding and estimate causal effects for patients ‘on the margin of treatment’, i.e. those prone to varying treatment practices.
Results
OLS analysis indicated that pharmacological treatment for ADHD was associated with slightly improved grade point average (0.05, 95% CI 0.02–0.09; grade point average s.d. 0.94). Instrumental variable analysis indicated no causal effect of pharmacological treatment on grade point average (−0.01, Anderson−Rubin 95% CI −1.13 to 0.15), individual school subjects or non-assessment.
Conclusions
For children and adolescents on the margin of pharmacological treatment for ADHD, we found no causal effect of pharmacological treatment on any of our measures of academic performance. Although further research is needed, this finding should be considered in the context of clinical decision-making and treatment planning.
Medical education has had a strong tradition of building reflective skills and concrete experimentation on a foundation of new ideas and knowledge. The BJPsych Advances special issue ‘Psychiatry in medical education’ introduced in this editorial is a feast for readers, inviting them to learn the latest advances in teaching and assessment across the world and to reflect on how this new knowledge might change their own practice, ultimately benefiting patient care.
Meju argues that the ‘Big, Black and Dangerous’ stereotype is still alive in psychiatry and leads to coercive care and deaths. This brief commentary considers the wider social and structural influences, clinical-decision making and circumstances in which bias might arise. Reducing bias requires adequate training and service capacity, good team functioning and further research to evaluate outcomes.
Educating medical students in the core skills of psychiatric examination and the implications of psychiatric comorbidities to medical care is of critical importance, given the increasing prevalence of a number of mental disorders and their increasing comorbidity with medical conditions. This article outlines psychiatry education in three of Singapore’s medical schools, where it forms a small yet integral part of the undergraduate and postgraduate curricula.
In north-east Scotland the stereotype ‘White-doctor–non-White patients’ is almost reversed, as international medical graduates join the workforce. Psychiatrists from culturally diverse backgrounds in a psychotherapy supervision group explored the benefits of cultural curiosity between clinicians and patients, and among colleagues. The group acknowledges the barriers, obstacles and hurt posed by cultural difference, and at the same time rejoices in the developmental advances that can be achieved for both patient and clinician when these aspects are examined and addressed with curiosity.
Psychiatry relies on narratives, observation and interpersonal data more than definitive tests. Errors in inference can lead to inappropriate treatment, avoidable adverse effects and delayed recovery. This article proposes an investigative framework for clinical reasoning tailored to community mental health services, in-patient wards and liaison teams by translating hypothetico-deductive reasoning into clinical practice: broad-then-focused enquiry, explicit competing hypotheses, a reliability hierarchy for weighing clues, proportionate action under uncertainty, and time-bound review. The framework is positioned alongside existing approaches and considers the emerging role of artificial intelligence as a complement to clinician-led formulation. With fictitious vignettes, diagrams and summary tables, the proposed framework aims to improve formulation quality, support safer decisions before diagnostic closure, and make reasoning transparent to patients and teams. As a proposal, it requires empirical evaluation against routine practice in clinical and educational settings before any claim of effectiveness can be made.
The relationship between mental health and human rights is complex and bidirectional: human rights abuses can have a significant adverse effect on mental health, and those with mental disorders are vulnerable to violations of their human rights. This article begins with an overview of human rights instruments most relevant to psychiatric practice, including the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). It discusses some globally occurring human rights abuses and the complex relationship between human rights and mental health. It gives an update on developments in human rights considerations in psychiatric practice over the past decade, and examines emerging challenges that continue to shape the intersection between mental health and human rights. Drawing on a British Medical Association article that highlighted the threats posed to health and human rights by neoliberalism and inequality, forced migration, climate change, new technology and violent conflict, the article explores the impact of these issues on mental health, as well as the challenges related to mental health legislation. It concludes with practical considerations for psychiatrists to safeguard and promote human rights.
State anxiety contributes to the nocebo effect, which is a factor in socially transmissible symptoms (pain, mood, medication side-effects) and conditions. This guest editorial suggests that the nocebo effect, through negative expectations of poor functioning, contributes to the social transmission of anxiety disorders with anxiety acting as both input and output.
Burnout arises from prolonged, unresolved work-related stress and adversely affects professional performance and overall well-being. Resident doctors and medical students are particularly vulnerable because of the demands of balancing clinical, academic and related responsibilities.
Aims
This study aimed to assess self-reported burnout and related stressors among UK resident doctors and medical students, and estimate the economic impact of burnout-related absenteeism among resident doctors.
Method
Self-report questionnaires assessing burnout and related stressors were distributed to UK resident doctors and medical students. A total of 2793 responses were received: 1439 (51.5%) from resident doctors and 1354 (48.5%) from medical students. Economic losses from absenteeism were calculated with a human capital approach.
Results
Burnout was reported by 70% (n = 1008) of resident doctors and 65.7% (n = 889) of medical students. Notably, 56.8% (n = 573) and 79.3% (n = 705) of resident doctors and medical students affected by burnout, respectively, were unaware of available support services. Relocation stress (85.1% of residents and 62.6% of students), financial stress (53.9% of residents and 57.8% of students) and poor work–life balance (32.1% of residents and 20.7% of students) were commonly reported. The annual economic burden of absenteeism related to burnout among resident doctors was estimated to reach £251.5 million.
Conclusions
Burnout among UK resident doctors and medical students may reflect a combination of underlying factors, including financial strain, relocation stress and difficulties with work–life balance. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions that support well-being and address financial and relocation challenges, which may, in turn, help prevent burnout and improve retention within the medical workforce. Reducing burnout and associated stressors may also help lessen its economic impact, allowing resources to be redirected towards patient care.
Kindness is often championed in mental healthcare but is too easily reduced to niceness or rhetoric. Drawing on my experience of research working alongside mental healthcare teams, I argue for intelligent kindness grounded in relational, courageous, boundaried and systemic practice that seeks what is ultimately good for patients and protects staff, even if it is not immediately apparent. Misapplied kindness risks burnout, moral injury and stalled recovery, whereas intelligent kindness protects staff integrity and patient dignity. Importantly, it must be structurally enabled across clinical, organisational and policy levels. Intelligent kindness is a fundamental requirement for humane mental healthcare.
Explanatory frameworks for mental disorders influence stigmatisation and clinical attitudes. Mechanistic biological explanations often yield negative effects on prognostic optimism and empathy. Evolutionary framings might reduce stigma, but this has rarely been tested empirically.
Aims
To experimentally test whether a brief educational intervention presenting an evolutionary explanation of anxiety, compared with a genetic explanation, would influence clinicians’ attitudes in directions consistent with anti-stigma goals.
Method
In this pre-registered, multi-site, cluster-randomised trial, 171 practising mental health clinicians across the UK and Ireland were randomised by session to receive a 30 min educational presentation on either evolutionary or genetic explanations for anxiety. Pre- and post-session questionnaires assessed clinicians’ optimism regarding patient recovery, perceived efficacy of psychosocial interventions, expected patient willingness to share diagnosis and seek help and perceived usefulness of the information. Data were analysed using Bayesian cumulative ordinal regression models.
Results
In line with pre-registered hypotheses, clinicians rated evolutionary explanations as substantially more useful for patients (odds ratio 5.05, 95% credible interval [2.46, 10.28], latent standard deviation shift 1.07) and for clinicians (odds ratio 3.10, 95% credible interval [1.62, 5.81], latent standard deviation shift 0.76) compared with genetic explanations. Evolutionary explanations also resulted in higher anticipated public willingness to seek psychiatric help (odds ratio 1.79, 95% credible interval [0.93, 3.35]) and share a diagnosis (odds ratio 1.62, 95% credible interval [0.88, 2.97]); optimism about patient recovery (odds ratio 1.58, 95% credible interval [0.71, 3.46]); perceived effectiveness of psychosocial interventions (odds ratio 1.62, 95% credible interval [0.84, 3.10]); and belief in the functional usefulness of negative emotions (β = 0.25 s.d., 95% credible interval [0.01, 0.49]). These effects were driven by both positive pre–post effects of evolutionary education and negative pre–post effects of genetic education compared with pre-education baseline. Exploratory analysis showed further anti-stigma effects.
Conclusions
Framing anxiety through an evolutionary lens substantially improved clinicians’ attitudes on various measures of stigmatisation compared with genetic explanations, and was rated as highly useful for both clinicians and patients.
This article highlights the relevance of the humanities to psychiatric discussions. It considers Thomas De Quincey’s autobiographical Confessions of an English Opium-Eater (1821), where the author charts his opium experiences and dependence. The text provides an intersection of subjective and objective evaluations of drug use, and records experiences undertaken before establishment of psychiatric disciplines. De Quincey’s self-analysis anticipates psychoanalytic techniques and psychopharmacology. This article raises questions applicable to the medical humanities, such as complexities of the patient’s voice, therapeutic creativity and how literature functions as a record of phenomenology. It underlines the relevance of literature for psychiatric practitioners.
This article challenges the assumption that the longstanding ‘Big, Black and Dangerous’ stereotype is irrelevant to current racial disparities in psychiatry. Despite its absence from mainstream discussions of inequality, I argue that this stereotype continues to shape inequalities in access, diagnosis and treatment across mental health services. The belief that this stereotype no longer matters is itself part of the problem. Drawing on historical and contemporary evidence, this article argues that meaningful reform requires confronting psychiatry’s racist legacy, and advocates for the inclusion of the history of racism in psychiatry within training curricula, alongside compulsory anti-bias education for psychiatrists.