To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In 2025, India’s Mid-day Meal Scheme (MDMS), the world’s largest school feeding programme, completed its third decade. This paper examines how families facing socio-economic hardship perceive and engage with a programme designed to meet children’s nutritional and educational needs. We analyse primary semi-structured interview data with multiple members of sixty households (246 participants) in two Indian states (Uttar Pradesh and Goa), conducted between 12/2022–03/2023. Our findings reveal that perceptions about the MDMS are driven less by its nutritional benefits and more by how it aligns with families’ aspirations and material realities, particularly their educational and income goals. We foreground parental perspectives as a critical but overlooked dimension in school meal research, positioning parents as central in shaping the programme’s reception and effectiveness. Faced with exceedingly constrained choices, families navigate complex trade-offs between competing priorities, such as collective versus individual well-being, resource allocation between education and food, and children’s time in school versus labour.
To estimate the national prevalence and distribution of food insecurity (FI) among households with children younger than 5 years in Ecuador and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) using two consecutive nationally representative surveys.
Design:
This cross-sectional study employed descriptive statistics and Tobit regression models using STATA v17.
Setting:
We used secondary data from the National Survey on Child Malnutrition in Ecuador, including food security (FS) information for 2022–2023 and 2023–2024, to construct the prevalence time series.
Participants:
We analysed data from 19 187 households (22 260 children) surveyed in the first round and 20 186 households (23 187 children) surveyed in the second round.
Results:
FIES showed adequate reliability in both rounds (Rasch reliability 0·80 and 0·79). Seven of eight FIES items showed significant reductions between rounds. The prevalence of moderate-or-severe FI remained high, decreasing from 40·79 % in 2022–2023 to 39·18 % in 2023–2024 (p = 0·239). Severe FI declined significantly from 4·83 % to 3·52 % (p = 0·002). In both rounds, FI was more prevalent in rural areas, the Amazon region, priority territories, Indigenous and Afro-descendant populations and households experiencing poverty or unmet basic needs. In 2023–2024, FI was associated with priority area residence, Indigenous ethnicity, poverty due to unmet basic needs, older child age groups and stunting.
Conclusions:
Despite reductions in severe FI, nearly four in ten households with young children in Ecuador continue to experience moderate-or-severe FI, with persistent territorial, ethnic and socio-economic inequalities. Integrated policies linking FS, child nutrition and poverty reduction are needed.
In light of rising forced global migration and disproportionately high levels of poverty among migrants, immigration systems have come to be understood as drivers of food insecurity in higher-income countries. At present, the mechanisms through which this operates are not well understood. The complex nature of immigration systems and statuses mean that experiences of migrant food insecurity are highly situated. There is a pressing need to examine, theorise and measure how these manifest in order to inform effective intervention and policy. In this article, we focus on the UK context to identify potential directions for the evolving food insecurity research agenda around forced migration. We outline how certain immigration statuses (trafficked, asylum seeker and refugee) intersect with different physical settings (rural/urban) to produce specific forms of food insecurity that urgently warrant further attention.
Household food (HFI) and water insecurity (HWI) have each been linked to poorer child health but their joint relationship is understudied. We used 2023–2024 Ecuadorian National Infant Malnutrition Survey data to examine the independent and joint associations of HFI and HWI exposure with illness, anaemia, and malnutrition in 6–59 month olds. The Food Insecurity Experience Scale measured marginal and moderate–severe HFI. Water indicators (source, availability, accessibility, microbial safety) measured HWI. We used a 4-category indicator to classify HFI only, HWI only, joint HFI/HWI, and secure food and water. Child respiratory (RI) and diarrheal illness (DI) were assessed from caregiver reports, anaemia from blood haemoglobin, and nutrition indicators from anthropometric measurements. Modified Poisson regression models estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR). Joint HFI/HWI was associated with a higher RI and DI prevalence, HFI only with higher RI, stunting and overweight/obesity, and HWI only with higher overweight/obesity but lower anaemia. The age-stratified analyses linked joint HFI/HWI and HFI only to higher RI and DI in 6–23 month olds and higher RI in 24–59 month olds. Joint HFI/HWI and HWI were linked to lower anaemia. In 24–59 month olds, HFI only was associated with higher stunting and HWI only with higher overweight/obesity. Exclusion of marginal HFI in the sensitivity analysis identified child-level double malnutrition as more prevalent in 24–59 month olds from HFI only or joint HFI/HWI households. These findings suggest HFI and HWI independently and jointly influence child health and nutrition, underscoring the need for effective multisectoral policies and interventions simultaneously targeting both.
Intuitive eating is an eating approach guided by internal hunger and satiety cues rather than restrictive eating rules. University years are marked by greater autonomy in food choices, vulnerability to food insecurity and sex-related differences in eating behaviours. This study examined the associations between intuitive eating subdimensions and food group-specific consumption scores according to food insecurity status and sex among university students aged 19–24 years in Türkiye. In this cross-sectional study, 545 university students completed a web-based survey comprising the Intuitive Eating Scale-2, the Food Insecurity Experience Scale and a FFQ. These associations were analysed using structural equation modelling separately by sex and food insecurity status. Intuitive eating subdimensions predicted dietary intake in distinct and sometimes opposing directions, with these patterns varying across sex and food insecurity status (p < 0·05). In males, intuitive eating subdimensions predicted intake of milk and dairy products, meat, eggs and legumes and vegetables and fruits; in females, they predicted similar food groups, as well as sugars and sweets and fast foods. Among individuals experiencing moderate or severe food insecurity, these patterns varied across food groups. The body–food choice congruence subdimension generally positively predicted healthier food groups, whereas eating for physical rather than emotional reasons negatively predicted sugars and sweets and fast foods. Unconditional permission to eat positively predicted the consumption of energy-dense foods, while reliance on hunger and satiety cues showed context-dependent patterns. In conclusion, associations between intuitive eating and dietary intake varied by sex and food insecurity status.
To examine changes in food insecurity among Syrian refugees after resettlement in Norway by length of stay.
Design:
A longitudinal cohort study surveying Syrian refugees 1- and 4-years post-resettlement to Norway as part of the CHART/Integration for Health study. Using the Seattle short form of the Household Food Security Survey Module, participants were asked if they had worried that food would run out or had experienced that food did not last over the recent year. Changes in food insecurity over time were examined. Additionally, the influence of socio-demographic, migration-related and health-related factors on these changes was assessed.
Setting:
Community setting.
Participants:
Adult Syrian refugees granted resettlement to Norway.
Results:
Totally, 353 Syrian refugees participated at baseline, and 132 completed the survey at both timepoints. The proportion reporting food insecurity was nearly unchanged from 1 to 4 years after arrival (from 18 % to 23 %; OR 1·3, 95 % CI 0·8–2·0). Individuals escaping Syria alone experienced increased food insecurity compared with those migrating with family. No modifying effect of gender, age, education, cohabiting with partner, number of children, work status prior to displacement, trauma exposure or poor mental health at baseline on change in food insecurity over time was identified.
Conclusion:
One year after resettlement in Norway, slightly more than one in six Syrian refugees reported food insecurity, with prevalence remaining stable 3 years later. Solo migration increased the risk of food insecurity over time, suggesting the potential value of strategies that keep families together during migration to help safeguard nutritional security.
Australia is experiencing a current juxtaposition between large amounts of food waste and increasing food insecurity. Surplus food produced by Australian hospitals is currently sent to landfill but could be temporarily repurposed to support food-insecure individuals and families until large-scale food system reform is achieved. We comment on potential uses for this surplus ‘food waste’, including four strategies: medically tailored meals, food provision at discharge, donation and internal hospital system reuse. These strategies could simultaneously reduce hospital food waste while providing food relief for those who need it most. We highlight the potential challenges to adopting this strategy in practice and provide a final call to action for hospital foodservices to challenge the status quo.
Women in West Africa experience unique vulnerabilities to food insecurity due to structural and cultural drivers rooted in gendered social norms. We aimed to systematically review and synthesise available evidence describing the extent of food insecurity among women in West Africa, focusing on prevalence, drivers, and gender inequalities. Global Health, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Academic Search Complete, and Scopus were searched from year 2000 up until 2023 for quantitative and qualitative studies reporting data on the prevalence or drivers of food insecurity among women (independently of or in comparison to men) in West Africa. Thirty-two studies identified from four West African countries (Nigeria, Ghana, Côte d’Ivoire, Benin) met the inclusion criteria. About 24% of women experienced food insecurity in Côte d’Ivoire, 33–52% in Ghana, and 23–75% in Nigeria. In Benin, a study using the Household Food Insecurity Experience Scale (HFIES) reported a mean score of 3.2. Female-headed households had a higher prevalence of food insecurity than male-headed households. Key drivers of food insecurity among women included age (mixed findings across studies), low education, larger households, women’s income level, adhering to traditional gender roles, being single or widowed, assets owned, access to and control over productive and agricultural resources (land, capital), and autonomy. Food insecurity among women in parts of West Africa is high in prevalence, with significant gender inequalities. Targeted interventions to improve women’s access to resources, education, and economic opportunities, while addressing restrictive gender norms, should be prioritised.
Food security (FS) has rarely been studied from the adolescent’s perspective. This paper describes FS, dietary diversity scores (DDS) and their predictors among Filipino boys and girls (aged 10–16 years) living in rural areas of the municipality of Nagcarlan, Laguna Province. Dietary intake (24-h recall) and other data were collected from adolescents and their caregivers before (T1: October–December 2019; N 285) and during (T2: August–October 2020; N 152) the COVID-19 community quarantine and analysed using multivariable Poisson regression. Perceived household FS by the adolescents increased from 34·7 % (T1) to 46·4 % (T2). At both timepoints, being a girl predicted better FS, whereas mental health problems were inversely related. At T2, mobility restrictions impacted FS negatively, whereas engagement in both food barter and edible gardening showed better FS. Dietary diversity improved from T1 to T2 (median DDS at T1:3, DDS > 5:23·2 %; and at T2:4; 26·4 %). Either number of siblings (T1) or household size (T2) was inversely related to DDS. At T1, better education of the household head and having a household member working overseas predicted better DDS, whereas at T2, mobility restrictions and belonging to the highest wealth tertile showed inverse associations. We conclude that FS and dietary diversity of Filipino adolescents in rural Nagcarlan did not deteriorate during the first months of COVID-19 community quarantine. Whereas mobility restrictions affected both FS and DDS negatively, food barter and edible gardening showed to be successful coping mechanisms. Further investigation should clarify the inverse relationship between wealth index and DDS and the role of food aid during the pandemic.
This chapter presents observational and experimental evidence, which suggests that hunger makes people more preoccupied with food and also more immoral. Hungry people are more likely to cheat, lie, and steal, and to prefer a small reward now rather than a larger reward later. Some of these effects may be beneficial in fostering behaviours that promote the acquisition of food. Hunger is a biopsychological stressor, which results in activation of the HPA axis and the release of cortisol. Elevated cortisol can result in more impulsive behaviour and, longer term, in irritability, low mood, and depression – all of these can be observed in hungry people, especially during prolonged fasting or starvation. Poverty is stressful, and hunger adds yet another source of stress, contributing to the elevated cortisol levels observed in people of low socio-economic status. Hunger then may contribute to crime and delinquency via its capacity to serve as an additional source of psychological stress. Hunger, resulting from food insecurity and insufficiency, occurs in many people. It is preventable, and its resolution would benefit both the hungry and society, via reduced crime and delinquency.
Coeliac disease (CD) is an autoimmune disease resulting in lifelong intolerance to gluten. Treatment of CD is a gluten-free diet (GFD). High gluten-free (GF) food costs contribute to GF-food insecurity (GF-FI) in households with children with CD. The study objective was to describe parental perceptions of the barriers/facilitators of GF-food security (GF-FS) and the health policies parents deem necessary to combat GF-FI. A subset analysis of a cross-sectional study examining household and child socio-demographic, child diet quality and GFD adherence, food environment, and GF-FI in parent–child dyads (n = 59) using validated questionnaires. Virtual interviews included 13 open-and-closed ended questions examining parent perceptions related to barriers/facilitators of GF-FS and health policies to address GF-FI. Questions were validated for face-and-content using an iterative process with parental responses deductively coded using the 5As of food insecurity theoretical framework. High GF-food costs (>90%) and the lack of effective GF-food specific health policies (∼94%) were the most commonly cited barriers to GF-FS, particularly in GF-FI households. Social media (>60%) was used to share information related to tax credits (15%) affordability, accessibility, and availability of GF-foods (75%). Parents deemed child tax credits (∼75%), development of food policies focused on education in schools (∼34%), dietary prescriptions (25%) and official recognition of CD as a disability (∼26%) as important to address GF-FI. In conclusion, parents perceive high GF-food costs and lack of effective GF-food health policies as important mediators of GF-FI. Social media platforms were widely used by the community to share information and solutions to address GF-FI.
Food insecurity among international graduate students in the USA is a nutrition equity challenge that remains largely unaddressed by the nutrition science community. Prevalence estimates range from 22 % to 46 % across institutions, substantially exceeding the national household average, driven by converging financial constraints, restricted employment opportunities and limited access to culturally appropriate foods. These conditions promote rapid dietary acculturation towards energy-dense, low-nutrient food patterns with well-established associations with insulin resistance, hypertension and cardiometabolic risk. Despite a growing empirical base, longitudinal evidence on dietary quality and health outcomes in this population is virtually absent, and university nutrition support systems are poorly adapted to the cultural dietary needs of an internationally diverse student body. This commentary calls on nutrition researchers, dietitians and universities to recognise food insecurity among international graduate students as a substantive public health nutrition concern warranting targeted research and culturally responsive institutional action.
Despite concerns about high consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) among New Zealand adolescents, there has been no formal quantification of their intake. This study is the first to assess UPF consumption in this population and examine its contribution to daily nutrient intake. A cross-sectional study was conducted involving students in Years 7–13 (approximately 10 years and older) from schools in Auckland, Bay of Plenty, and Waikato. Data collection took place in classroom settings during school terms two and three of 2024. Dietary intake was recorded using Intake24, an electronic 24-hour dietary recall tool adapted for the New Zealand context. All foods consumed—including ingredients in mixed meals—were classified into four categories using the NOVA system: Unprocessed or Minimally Processed, Processed Culinary Ingredients, Processed, and Ultra-Processed(1). The proportion of daily energy derived from UPFs was calculated. Participants were divided into tertiles based on UPF consumption, and nutrient intake across these groups was compared using one-way ANOVA. Dietary data were collected from 631 adolescents across 16 schools, encompassing 1,385 unique food items. UPFs accounted for 62.5 ± 25.5% (mean ± SD) of total daily energy intake. While overall energy intake did not differ significantly across UPF consumption tertiles, notable differences in nutrient intake were observed. After adjustment for energy intake and sex, adolescents in the highest UPF tertile had significantly lower intakes of protein (P<0.001), fibre (P=0.04), beta-carotene (P<0.001), magnesium (P<0.001), potassium (P<0.001), zinc (P<0.001), phosphorus (P<0.001), iron (P=0.03) and Vitamin E (p<0.001). Ultra-processed food intake was associated with significantly higher intakes of carbohydrates (P=0.005), saturated fat (P<0.001), sugar (P<0.001) and sodium (P<0.01). These findings provide foundational insight into the extent of UPF consumption among New Zealand adolescents and its impact on diet quality. The proportion of energy derived from UPFs aligns closely with international data from the United States (67%) and the United Kingdom (66%). Further analysis will explore the specific types of UPFs consumed, their sources, and the social contexts in which they are eaten.
Food waste is a major problem that contributes to climate change, while inequities in access to healthy food persist among socially vulnerable populations. Surplus food redistribution initiatives operate at the intersection of waste reduction and efforts to support food access. Our objective was to explore and better understand the perspectives and experiences of organisational stakeholders within the food redistribution system in the Canton of Vaud, Switzerland.
Design:
We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured qualitative interviews, as well as field observations. Data were analysed using conventional qualitative content analysis.
Setting:
This study took place in the Canton of Vaud in Western Switzerland, with most participants being in the capital city of Lausanne.
Participants:
A variety of participants were interviewed, including managers of the food delivery organisations, social service organisations and grocery stores. A total of fourteen interviews and eight field observations were conducted.
Results:
Participants described the food redistribution system as a collaborative effort at reducing food waste and increasing access to nutritious foods for socially disadvantaged populations. Four major themes emerged: (1) Processes are in place to ensure the food that reaches individuals is reasonably fresh and of high nutritional quality; (2) food redistribution contributes to addressing food needs, while simultaneously reducing food waste; (3) a high degree of creativity and flexibility is required to optimally use the redistributed foods and (4) all parties involved in the food redistribution participate with goodwill towards one another.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates that the success of the multi-stakeholder programme currently in place to redistribute food products in the Canton of Vaud is due to collaboration, adaptability and a shared goal of reducing food waste while improving food access.
Food insecurity, in children, is associated with poorer health and academic outcomes. Around 27% of New Zealand households have reported food insecurity(1). The Ka Ora, Ka Ako | Healthy School Lunches Programme(2) initiative in New Zealand schools aims to reduce food insecurity(3). This cross-sectional study assesses the nutritional contribution of the government-funded school lunches to daily nutrient intake among adolescents. The study compares nutrient intake during school hours between consumers (students from schools with funded lunch programme who ate during school hours) and non-consumers (students from schools with funded lunch programme who did not consume a funded lunch) and students from schools ineligible for the funded lunch. Dietary data was collected in 2024 via an online 24-hour recall (Intake24) from 390 intermediate and secondary school students in Auckland, Waikato and Bay of Plenty. Demographic data was collected via survey. Nutrient intake from food consumed during the school day (between 9am–3pm) was considered ‘school lunch’ and expressed as a percentage of total daily intake. Students were grouped as consumers (n=95); non-consumers (n=109); and ineligible (n=186). Comparisons between groups were conducted using Kruskal-Wallis tests. The funded school lunch provided an average of 26% of daily energy and contributed proportionally higher amounts of several key nutrients when compared to energy provision, including fibre (31% of daily fibre intake), zinc (30%), and beta-carotene (37%). Consumers had significantly higher nutrient intakes than non-consumers. Nutrient contributions were comparable between consumers and ineligible students, except for total sugars, which were lower in consumers. In 2024, New Zealand’s government-funded school lunches were nutrient-dense and provided better nutritional value than lunches sourced elsewhere from students in eligible schools and similar or better nutritional value than lunches of ineligible students. Findings support continued investment and potential expansion of the programme to improve adolescent nutrition and reduce health inequities.
To examine the association between long-term poverty exposure and census tract-level food insecurity rates across the USA.
Design:
Cross-sectional study using nationwide census data. Spatial error models were used to estimate differences in food insecurity rates by long-term poverty exposure, adjusting for rurality–urbanicity.
Setting:
All census tracts in the USA.
Participants:
US census tracts with complete data on food insecurity, long-term poverty status and rural–urban classification. Due to historical differences in data availability, sample sizes varied across models.
Results:
In the inclusive framework, tracts classified as Persistent Poverty Since 1990 had food insecurity rates 7·2 percentage points higher than other tracts (P < 0·001); tracts classified as Enduring Poverty Since 1980 had rates 7·1 points higher (P < 0·001); and those classified as Enduring Poverty Since 1970 had rates 6·3 points higher (P < 0·001). In the mutually exclusive framework, where each tract was assigned to only one poverty category based on the earliest qualifying decade, food insecurity was 6·3 points higher in tracts with Persistent Poverty only, 4·7 points higher in tracts with Enduring Poverty Since 1980 only, and 6·3 points higher in tracts with Enduring Poverty Since 1970 only (all P < 0·001). All models adjusted for Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes and accounted for residual spatial autocorrelation.
Conclusions:
Long-term poverty exposure is strongly associated with elevated food insecurity at the census tract level. These findings underscore the importance of integrating historical measures of disadvantage and the value of tract-level analysis for identifying communities at risk of food insecurity.
The relationship among food insecurity, financial strain, and depression and anxiety is complex and likely bidirectional, yet most studies have examined this relationship unidirectionally and cross-sectionally. Our study investigates the longitudinal bidirectional relationship among depression and/or anxiety and food insecurity and financial strain.
Methods
Food insecurity and financial strain were measured at four waves across 13 years in the NESDA cohort. Clinical diagnoses of depression and anxiety were determined using the CIDI. Symptom severity was assessed using the IDS-SR and BAI. Lagged multilevel models examined whether food insecurity and financial strain predicted changes in depression and/or anxiety and vice versa. All models adjusted for age, sex, education, household income contributors, and prior outcome levels.
Results
Among 2,567 individuals (mean age 42.4 years (SD 13.2), 34.6% women), higher food insecurity and financial strain significantly predicted increased odds of onset of depressive disorders (OR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.43–3.15 and OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.51–2.45, respectively), and greater depressive symptom severity at the next wave (p’s for trend < .001 and p = .001, respectively). Associations with anxiety disorders and symptom severity were weaker. Conversely, depressive disorders and symptoms predicted higher subsequent food insecurity and financial strain, whereas anxiety symptoms did not.
Conclusions
Our findings support a bidirectional temporal association among food insecurity, financial strain and depression, with weaker evidence for anxiety. Approaches that address financial hardship and mental health may be beneficial. Further long-term studies in diverse populations are needed to clarify mechanisms linking financial insecurity with mental health and to guide effective intervention development.
Food insecurity is prevalent among underserved communities and contributes to maternal–child health disparities. The perinatal period – from pregnancy through 1 year postpartum – provides a critical window of opportunity to identify and address food insecurity. However, perinatal providers face barriers that prevent them from providing screening, referrals and follow-up services. The study aimed to understand barriers perceived by perinatal providers to implement strategies to screen, refer and follow up for food-insecure pregnant people and children living in underserved areas.
Design:
This qualitative phenomenological study explored multi-level barriers perceived by perinatal providers when implementing strategies for screening, referral and follow-up for food insecurity guided by the socio-ecological model.
Setting:
This study was conducted within five zip codes of Southern Nevada (89101, 89106, 89030, 89031 and 89032) selected for their prevalence of food insecurity and health disparities.
Participants:
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fifteen perinatal providers.
Results:
Barriers at the individual provider level included lack of knowledge and education on food insecurity; at the interpersonal level included patient hesitancy to reveal sensitive information to providers; at the institutional level included lack of standard procedures to conduct screening, referrals and follow-up services; and at the community and policy levels identified organisational capacity and historical distrust of healthcare systems as obstacles to offering equitable care for food insecurity in perinatal settings.
Conclusion:
Addressing these multi-level barriers is essential to implementing effective food insecurity mitigation strategies within perinatal care settings. Utilising the created recommendations may promote equitable care for food insecurity within clinical and community perinatal settings.
Food and nutrition insecurity in high‑income countries is increasingly persistent, driven by intersecting economic, social and environmental disruptions. In Australia, acute shocks such as the COVID‑19 pandemic, floods and bushfires, alongside chronic pressures including rising food prices, housing stress and concentrated corporate power, have exposed structural weaknesses in food access, governance and system resilience. This review examines how community‑led responses to food and nutrition insecurity function during disruption, whether they buffer short-term hardship or contribute to adaptive capacity and redistribution of agency. Guided by the six‑pillar food security framework and a socio-ecological model, responses are examined across household, community, organisational and governance levels. A continuum of responses is identified, ranging from downstream emergency food relief that buffers immediate hardship through to community and organisational food infrastructure that strengthens local resilience and governance‑level responses with greater transformative potential. Drawing on this synthesis, we propose the SEEDS (Socio-Ecological Enablers of Dietary Security) Model, which conceptualises how food system responses across socio-ecological levels and over time can progress from buffering (acute) to adaptation (medium‑term) and ultimately transformation (long‑term). Central to this framework is a shift in decision‑making power, accountability and participation. While many initiatives improve food access and short‑term stability during crises, the greatest potential for transformation lies where responses are embedded within governance structures, enable meaningful community participation and influence policy, procurement and resource allocation. Implications for public health nutrition practice include expanded roles in systems leadership, cross‑sector governance and advocacy for upstream policy reform.
Rising levels of household food insecurity in England, and associated health and well-being impacts for children, have led to calls to expand access to free school meals (FSM). Policymakers have been hesitant to extend provision of FSM due to concerns surrounding acceptability, affordability and implementation challenges. The most effective strategies for expanding FSM are not yet fully understood. This work aims to fill this gap by examining school meal policy from the perspective of multiple stakeholders, to provide actionable recommendations for policies that could expand school meal provision.
Design:
A qualitative interview study design was used. The data were analysed using the Framework Method, underpinned by the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework. Themes were categorised into context-related and implementation-related factors. Detailed recommendations were discussed at the macro, meso and micro levels of the school food system.
Setting:
The study was conducted in England, UK.
Participants:
Seventeen stakeholders represented the views of local, regional and national government, policy, academia and schools.
Results:
Stakeholders indicated that policies should prioritise stigma reduction and integrate expansion of school meals with existing school policies where possible, including the monitoring of school food standards and ensuring maintenance of school food quality. Stakeholders also suggested improvement to the administrative process and communication with families and recommended a joined-up approach linking interventions with common goals across the whole food system.
Conclusions:
Crucially, sufficient financial support is essential for successful implementation.